Monday, July 22, 2013

Purchase Page Coming Soon

We intend to develop a page dedicated to purchase financing.  

Right now we're discussing the tools and links to help homeowners educate themselves.  The tools will range from a cost estimator to regulations in particular states.  If you have any idea's please post. 



-- 

Sunday, July 21, 2013

HECM

HECM can be an attractive option for a senior interested in pre-paying their mortgage balance's.

Consider a Senior who has limited refinance options available that has an existing lien with a high cost of credit.  Consider a Senior who has a substantial fully amortized long term mortgage balance that was recently originated. Seniors in these types of situations and more may be able to reduce their balance faster pre-paying a HECM.  

Not only can they likely reduce the balance faster they also provide themselves with future credit availability with the same flexible terms.  Future credit availability that is non-taxable. Future interest that is still tax deductible when paid.   

These types of loans have a bad reputation for a lot of bad reasons.  You tell me below....where is it different than any other note securitized to a primary residence?  If there's a balance , it has to be paid.  You don't have to allow interest to compound in Reverse, that's a choice and one that can make sense in some cases.  

The other point to consider in today's mortgage market is cost. Traditional Government Mortgage products are more costly than the HECM.  HECM's don't require funding an Escrow account lessening overall settlement fee's.  The lender fee's outside of possible origination are nominal.  Annual Mortgage Insurance is less & the Upfront Mortgage Insurance can be much less if utilizing the HECM Saver program.  Otherwise it's only 25 basis points more. 

HECM needs more serious consideration and market penetration shows that to be the case.  There are many Seniors who at a minimum need to consider this program. 


Thursday, July 18, 2013




The HARP 2.0 program has provided greater relief for many more homeowners. I still think the program has been under utilized.  Originators of both Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac versions need to consider the full possibilities instead of simply addressing negative equity.

We also have misinformed homeowners who may have been denied for HARP 1.0 and given up. Further complicating matters is the application of Automated Underwriting programs. Fannie's Mae provides appraisal waivers for submitted value within variance of Fannie Mae's value assertion. This allow's for more creativity in obtaining a homeowners approval. Freddie Mac's loan prospector issuance of waivers is not as aggressive Fannie's but its still a possibility. I've also noticed where Originators and Processor's will accept a findings that may adjust the borrowers pricing when an alternative finding with less risk to the investor is possible.

I could go on with examples of homeowners being denied at one lender and approved at another simply because of improper loan structuring but it doesn't stop there.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac issue their guidance as the agency willing to purchase the loan based on those parameters.  Investor's who loan the money have a certain amount of exposure.  As such many place their own guidance/overlays to further restrict the generic guidance.

So...we have improper application analysis, improper automated underwriting, overlays & misinformed homeowners who could greatly benefit from a refinance.

Unlimited loan to value and no minimum credit score....what more could we ask for?

Monday, July 15, 2013




_____________________________________________________________Mortgagee Letters



FHA issue's Mortgagee Letters to industry insiders and the public regarding their policy and procedural updates.  Attached are direct links for each mortgagee letter.  If you have questions, we have answers. 



Mortgagee Letters